How the Provenance Index is built.

A transparent rating system for art-world intermediaries. Six data sources. Five weighted subscores. Quarterly refresh. Institutions cannot pay to improve their grade — methodology and source data are published in full.

/ 01

Guiding Principles.

The Provenance Index exists to answer a single question for serious collectors: which art-world intermediaries actually preserve collector and artist value — and which extract from it?

  1. Public records + auction data. Every input sourced from publicly available auction records, court filings, ArtTactic data, Arts Economics reports, and Protagonist Art's collector-cohort framework.
  2. Institutions cannot pay. No rated institution has paid, can pay, or has been offered the opportunity to pay for inclusion, exclusion, or modification of their grade.
  3. Quarterly refresh. Grades update every 90 days; material events trigger interim updates.
  4. Subscore transparency. Every grade decomposes into five public subscores.
  5. Right of correction. Institutions may submit documented corrections via published Appeals process.
/ 02

The Six Data Sources.

/ Source 01

Auction Records

Christie's, Sotheby's, Phillips, Heritage public auction records. Cross-referenced for accuracy and resale-history tracking.

/ Source 02

ArtTactic Market Analytics

Industry-leading art market data provider. Sale-rate, sell-through, average-price analytics by category.

/ Source 03

Arts Economics Annual Reports

Clare McAndrew + Art Basel + UBS annual market reports. Industry-standard market sizing and trend analysis.

/ Source 04

ArtTrack Provenance Research

Provenance research and authentication track records. Critical for due-diligence subscore.

/ Source 05

Critic Reviews (Aggregated)

Aggregated critic reviews from Artforum, Frieze, ArtNews, The Art Newspaper, ARTnews. Industry-perspective benchmarking.

/ Source 06

Protagonist Collector-Cohort Framework

Protagonist Art's published collector-cohort framework. Anonymized opt-in collector feedback on intermediary experience.

/ 03

The Five Subscores.

Authenticity / Due Diligence

Provenance research rigor, fraud prevention, authentication processes, condition reporting accuracy. The foundational requirement for any art-world intermediary.

Pricing Transparency

Listed-price vs. negotiated-price disclosure. Buyer's premium clarity. Reserve-price practices. Resale-right administration. Distinguishes transparent intermediaries from opaque ones.

Artist Treatment

How artists are paid, supported, represented. Primary-market revenue share. Resale-royalty administration (where applicable). Artist-foundation work. Artist non-payment / lawsuit history.

Collector Service

Buyer-side experience, condition reports, framing + transit, insurance, post-sale support, repeat-collector advisory. The relationship-quality dimension.

Liquidity / Resale Posture

Secondary-market posture and market-making behavior. Resale-pricing transparency. Auction-house consignment access. The exit-strategy dimension for any collector position.

/ 04

Weighting & Scoring.

Subscore Dimension
Weight
Authenticity / Due Diligence
28%
Liquidity / Resale Posture
20%
Pricing Transparency
18%
Artist Treatment
17%
Collector Service
17%
Composite Score
100%

Why these weights? Authenticity / Due Diligence is heaviest because forgery and provenance fraud are catastrophic for any institutional collector position. Liquidity / Resale Posture is second because the long-term value of any acquisition depends on its eventual sellability. Pricing Transparency, Artist Treatment, and Collector Service complete the composite.

Independent data. Independent standards.

The Provenance Index is published under a methodology that is reproducible from public-record sources. Institutions cannot pay to improve grades. The data is licensed to institutional users via the API.

Browse the Index Institutional API